Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?
Martin Langhoff
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 06:23:33 EST 2009
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
> simplejson.
I am not seeing the prob on 0.82, only on 0.84.5 -- I think the patch
was never applied to 0.82
> If this is 0.84 on F11, then we can use what python 2.6
> provides.
So that'd be a revert, instead of my (narrower) patch. It's not a big
revert at all.
> Daniel has taken over maintenance of 0.84 so it's him to decide.
Ok.
m
--
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Devel
mailing list