Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?
Martin Langhoff
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 04:14:18 EST 2009
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the
> parser is a C module (AFAIR).
>
> Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?
Re-reading this -- and given that yes, it's a bug in the cjson parser
-- probably a revert is the sanest thing to do.
Do you agree?
m
--
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Devel
mailing list