Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

Martin Langhoff martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 04:14:18 EST 2009

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> Right now just using the json module in python 2.6 may be best as the
> parser is a C module (AFAIR).
> Is because of a bug in cjson why those files aren't being parsed?

Re-reading this -- and given that yes, it's a bug in the cjson parser
-- probably a revert is the sanest thing to do.

Do you agree?

 martin.langhoff at gmail.com
 martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff

More information about the Devel mailing list