csound vs olpcsound

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 07:17:35 EDT 2009


Hi Victor,

Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I was aware that csound in Fedora
is 5.03. My query was based on getting Fedora up to the latest version
(so if we needed olpcsound if fedora had >= 5.08). I'm going to follow
this up to see where I can get. As a side note, do you know what the
removed deps were?

Cheers,
Peter

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:14 AM,  <Victor.Lazzarini at nuim.ie> wrote:
> Very strange, but olpcsound is based on csound 5.08. As far as I know there
> is no
> fedora package for csound 5.08 or 5.10. If there is, it should be no
> problem moving from olpcsound to csound. I would not like to
> move from olpcsound to csound 5.03, though.
> olpcsound is not a fork, it is based on the same sources as Csound5, with
> less components and dependencies. It is just a build option (for scons).
>
> Victor
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:12 am
> Subject: csound vs olpcsound
> To: OLPC Developer's List <devel at lists.laptop.org>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I know that olpcsound was originally a fork of csound for olpc. I
>> noticed just now on the sugarlabs page for the 0.84 release [1] that
>> it depends on csound 5.08/5.10 and makes no mention of
>> olpcsound. Does
>> that mean that olpcsound is now obsolete and that once we get csound
>> in Fedora upgraded to a remotely recent version that olpcsound can
>> just disappear?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Sugar_Platform/0.84
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at lists.laptop.org
>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
> Dr Victor Lazzarini, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Music,National University of
> Ireland, Maynooth
>
>


More information about the Devel mailing list