1.5 power management, input events, wakeup events

[Martin Langhoff]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Drake<dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> The end-user interface for those is unlikely to change much (if we do
> the ACPI tables right).

And we will pay the performance cost of ACPI? It was an oft-repeated
thing that ACPI was evil because of complexity and slowness in the
critical path to super smooth sleep-resume cycles.

Were we overestimating the impact?

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff at gmail.com
 martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff