rpm vs xo & activity updates

[Bryan Kearney]

Daniel Drake wrote:
> - There is certainly room for improvement in future, but finding
> development time in the short term may be a bit tricky... or perhaps we
> will be able to raise community interest in making or implementing a
> plan for improvement... :)
> 
> Daniel
> 


Have you looked at how ruby gems and rpms interact? I do not have a 
tremendous amount of experience, but it seems like the user can select 
either rpms or gems to update, and it "just works".

-- bk