is anyone actually doing Windows on XO work here?
christoph.derndorfer at gmail.com
Thu Jul 23 06:25:13 EDT 2009
Oh, and just in case anybody hasn't see it yet, Ivan Krstic published a blog
post well worth reading yesterday: "Sweet nonsense omelet" -
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Christoph Derndorfer <
christoph.derndorfer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Same here, I wrote a short article (mainly around Mitch's e-mail and my
> take of things) for olpcnews.
> However due to scheduling constraints it will only be published next week.
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Bastien <bastienguerry at googlemail.com>wrote:
>> Bastien <bastienguerry at googlemail.com> writes:
>> > Thanks *very much* for these explanations.
>> > I hope this kind of information can find its way through the OLPC blog,
>> > maybe with a little more context. Then we can fight the FUD by linking
>> > to these explanations.
>> I've just written an entry about this on OLPC France's blog:
>> Sorry, this is in french and I don't have time to translate it now.
>> But basically it tries to do this:
>> 1. to clarify what is Sugar;
>> 2. to explain what was the process of developing it for the XO, then for
>> any hardware -- this explanation giving hints on why (1) is sometimes
>> hard to understand and why NN comment needs clarification;
>> 3. to tell (again) what is OLPC/Microsoft all about.
>> I have pointed to some of the messages from this list. I hope this post
>> can help in getting rid of disinformation.
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> Christoph Derndorfer
> co-editor, olpcnews
> url: www.olpcnews.com
> e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com
e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Devel