Fedora Desktop on XO
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Fri Jan 9 00:08:15 EST 2009
>> > For the evince vs sugar-evince I suspect we need to try and get the
>> > mainline evince split out into evince and evince-libs so that we
>> > can build sugar-evince against it similar to what we do with
>> > abiword and write (I think that's its name).
>> Yep, sounds good.
> When I get a sec I'll look at what's required and file a RH bug for
> evince to see if we can't get the package split up.
BTW where does the current sugar-evince srpm live?
More information about the Devel