New F11 for the XO-1 build 5-timezones
Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrothal at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 14 17:30:56 EDT 2009
Here is another strange thing, timezone info is not preserved through reboots (this is
w/o _any_ network connection) and then hwclock and date although reported in the same timezone they have
different time eg:
[root at localhost olpc]# hwclock
Fri 14 Aug 2009 05:14:30 PM CEST -0.042609 seconds
[root at localhost olpc]# date
Fri Aug 14 23:14:53 CEST 2009
although the control panel timezone is in CEST+2 and the /etc/adjtime is polulated with:
[root at localhost olpc]# more /etc/adjtime
0.000000 1250285471 0.000000
1250285471
LOCAL
Doing an ntpdate update puts th clock in the right timezone without affecting the
hwclock.
One strange thing I notice looking for localtime files with mc and hitting Edit by mistake (the first time :) is that both /etc/localtime or /etc/avahi/etc/localtime said "converting from Mac format" when opened for editing. Is this normal?
I do not know to what extend the timezone problem may be related to the rtcwake problems but is strange
on its own.
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org> wrote:
> From: Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org>
> Subject: Re: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "OLPC Development" <devel at lists.laptop.org>, "OLPC Testing" <testing at lists.laptop.org>, "Fedora OLPC List" <fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Friday, August 14, 2009, 8:31 AM
> yioryos wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Paul Fox <pgf at laptop.org>
> > > Subject: Re: New F11 for the XO-1 build 5
> > > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal at yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: "OLPC Development" <devel at lists.laptop.org>,
> "OLPC Testing"
> > <testing at lists.laptop.org>,
> "Fedora OLPC List" <fedora-olpc-list at redhat.com>
> > > Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009, 5:50 PM
> > > hi yioryos --
> > >
> > > yioryos wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- On Thu, 8/13/09, James Cameron
> <quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > rtcwake testing has shown that
> it needs --utc after the
> > > > > first shutdown.
> > > > > Prior to then the /etc/adjtime
> file is zero.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In my hands both time 'rtcwake -um
> mem -a -s 10' and 'time
> > > > rtcwake -m mem -a -s 10' are a hit
> and miss. '-um' is better
> > > > (~50%) while without the UCT option
> is hardly 10%. Usually
> > >
> > > what exactly do you mean, by "50%" and "10%".
> rtcwake
> > > doesn't wake at all? wakes too soon?
> >
> > Either. 10, 50% sucess means wakeup in 11-12sec
>
> okay. waking too soon means you were woken by
> something
> other than the RTC. you can "cat
> /sys/power/wakeup-source"
> to see what it was.
>
> > > hmm. i think we need to step back a bit.
> > >
> > > let's ignore powerd for now -- please disable it
> with:
> > > # initctl stop powerd
> > >
> > > then, let's get rid of spurious wakeups, by
> turning off
> > > most wakeup events:
> > > # echo 0 >
> > > /sys/power/wakeup_events/all
> > >
> > > the lid, the power button, and the RTC alarm
> should still
> > > be
> > > capable of waking the system at this point.
> > >
> > > now run:
> > > # rtcwake --utc -m mem -s 10
> > >
> >
> > As JC reported, under these conditions the XO wakes
> up reliably.
>
> excellent. so rtcwake is reliable, except for the
> timezone issue.
>
> thanks for your testing. olpc-powerd-10-1.fc11 should
> be
> available soon, which contains a workaround for the
> rtcwake
> issue. (you can try it sooner by simply adding
> "--utc" to each
> of the rtcwake commandlines in the powerd script.)
> and quozl and
> i have brought the issue to the attention of the
> util-linux-ng
> folks. (it actually seems that the kernel might be
> treating the
> daylight savings time field from the RTC a little too
> casually.)
>
> paul
> =---------------------
> paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list