MPPT
Paul Fox
pgf at laptop.org
Thu Aug 6 22:58:57 EDT 2009
wad wrote:
>
> The context is that we are trying to ensure that an Maximum
> Power Point Tracking algorithm can be implemented on the DC
> power input of the XO-1.5.
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
>
> > John Watlington wrote:
> >
> >> The problem comes from the need for the algorithm to start
> >> from a position of low current drain. The MPPT algorithm
> >> should probably be disabled when the laptop is running and
> >> the battery is below some threshold (say 10 -15% ?)
> >
> > Yep. I don't think it will matter though. The core of the
> > problem is that our peak CPU power draw is > 10W where on
> > gen 1 is was <=10W and we aren't going to fix that.
>
> We should play with having the power daemon clock down the CPU in
> some cases.
how much would that save? how fast would the reaction time need
to be? (i.e., how responsive does the MPPT algorithm need to be?
>
> Perhaps modifying adding a "solar power provided or removed" subtype
> to the Battery Status Change SCI interrupt from the EC ?
how would this be detected automatically? by voltage level?
> This could be used to limit the peak processor clock when the battery
> is very low.
>
> Limiting the peak processor clock when the battery is very low
> and we don't have any DC input might extend the battery life
> slightly as well.
how much remaining runtime are we talking about, when we talk about
"very low"? and again, how much can we affect the end result?
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Devel
mailing list