Disk layout for XO-1.5
Martin Langhoff
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Tue Aug 4 14:32:38 EDT 2009
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Albert Cahalan<acahalan at gmail.com> wrote:
> First partition: FAT16 with 4 KB clusters
> Second partition: LVM with ext4
Gentlemen, before LVM can be considered, we need
- fs resize that is fail-safe in the face of powerloss, for the fs
types we plan to use.
- lvm resize that is fail-safe in the face of powerloss
I don't see how we are going to get that. Given that LVM is not
applicable, and that part of our system lands in /home (Activities), I
suspect that the best arrangement is
- small FAT16 for boot
- a single partition of whatever kind we want, taking the rest of the space
And we'll keep playing games with symlink trees and overlaid
bindmounts -- which we have to do anyway as olpc-update is the only
failsafe OS upgrade mechanism we have so far.
Once BTRFS is mature, yum learns to snapshot-upgrade-or-revert and we
switch to that combo, we will be able to retire olpc-update, the
symlink trees and the fancy overlays.
In the meantime, anyone proposing a change of affairs needs a very
solid plan that addresses all the points discussed in the discussion
with dsd about a month ago about olpc-update.
cheers,
m
--
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Devel
mailing list