Stability and Memory Pressure in 8.2
pgf at laptop.org
pgf at laptop.org
Tue Sep 9 15:13:28 EDT 2008
i wrote:
>
> i think there's definitely a sugar shell leak. here's some
> partial data, gathered from a few machines on my desk right now.
>
> (be careful with the column headings -- i rearranged partway through
> to get separate CODE and DATA columns.)
>
> (also, don't do an absolute compare between the 708 build and the
> 759 build -- the latter is chock full of activites, the former
> has none at all.)
>
>
> build 708:
> top - 17:45:17 up 59 min, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.05, 0.01
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR CODE DATA %MEM COMMAND
> 1741 olpc 15 0 53128 27m 13m 4 14m 12.2 python
>
> same build 708, roughly twenty minutes later:
> top - 18:03:16 up 1:17, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.01, 0.00
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR CODE DATA %MEM COMMAND
> 1741 olpc 15 0 53308 28m 13m 4 14m 12.3 python
another hour later on 708:
top - 19:06:19 up 2:21, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR CODE DATA %MEM COMMAND
1741 olpc 15 0 53576 28m 13m 4 15m 12.3 python
call it 200 KB/hour?
>
> build 759:
> top - 12:20:00 up 39 min, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.06, 0.11
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 1461 olpc 20 0 60576 33m 14m S 0.3 14.5 0:48.38 python
>
> same build 759, almost two hours later:
> top - 14:04:11 up 2:23, 3 users, load average: 0.04, 0.06, 0.08
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR CODE DATA %MEM COMMAND
> 1461 olpc 20 0 65964 38m 14m 4 23m 16.7 python
and another hour on 759:
top - 15:07:25 up 3:27, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.02
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR CODE DATA %MEM COMMAND
1461 olpc 20 0 70468 42m 14m 4 28m 18.6 python
seems more like 4.5 MB/hour.
(there are a lot of variables in play here -- the main thing is
that something's certainly leaking.)
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Devel
mailing list