[sugar] 0.84/9.1 planning.
meta.sj at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 16:36:16 EDT 2008
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <ed at laptop.org> wrote:
> I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan
Sounds like it is time for a naming contest for this [repeating]
event. Some that have been suggested / implied:
OLPC Miniconference 
XOcamp [Cambridge 2008]
> ship that as 9.1. And we'll keep going to qualify and ship more of it in
> 9.2, and more in 10.1 (or is that 0.1??), etc.
+1 (isn't that A.1 ?)
Other questions : should this be a full week, or closer to three days?
How often is this sort of week-long meeting valuable to have?
More information about the Devel