[sugar] Sugar USB testing
martin at martindengler.com
Wed Oct 8 00:20:23 EDT 2008
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:02:57PM -0400, pgf at laptop.org wrote:
> marco pesenti gritti wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > CCing the Sugar list.
> and adding devel.
> > >
> > > It seems that one of the problems we will be encountering with generic
> > > spins is footprint. Even a standard Ubuntu without Sugar was seeming
> > > too fat to load from a LiveCD on a Pentium 4 with 256K of DRAM.
> > I'm planning to dogfood the Fedora LiveUSB and I'll have a look to
> > memory usage while doing so. In principle, unless there are relevant
> > memory costs given by running on a LiveUSB, I'd expect it to work
> > decently.
> i've been curious for a while -- can we have a show of hands for
> how many people dogfood the existing XO s/w?
I do, but I'm not a developer, and I use compcache to help with the
memory pressure (though I typed "lsjournal" a few hours (!) ago and it
still hasn't unfrozen).
> i _really_ think we need to make the XO base _and_ sugar be a
> place that developers are comfortable living in.
That'd be cool.
PS - my only issue besides the non-inclusion of compcache (
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/28 ) is that Terminal's backspace doesn't
get processed correctly by screen otherwise I'd spend all my time in
Sugar. Right now I switch between console/screen and
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Devel