F-10 joyride vs 8.2 - getting fixes upstream.

[Tomeu Vizoso]

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Adding a fixed build koji details for olpc-utils and adding
> fedora-olpc list to the mail. (oh and fixed some copy/paste bits! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
>> I've started looking through the various packages that have been
>> pulled into joyride as part of the upgrade to Fedora-10 and reviewing
>> packages to see what differs from upstream, 8.2 and various other
>> olpcX packages. I'm aware of a number of packages that have been
>> pulled in due to differences in the packages between the old olpc3
>> branch and upstream, some have bugs, I'll add bugs for a lot more. I
>> also notice that the "Size delta" on the 8.2 vs joyride build is
>> reporting 0meg difference which is clearly rubbish :-) Can someone fix
>> it for me please. The URL I'm referring to is
>> http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride_vs_8.2.html
>>
>> To start with I've fixed the following
>>
>> -ohm 0.1.1-6.21.20080921git.olpc3
>> +ohm 0.1.1-6.11.20080119git.fc7
>>
>> - Merged the changed from F-9 to F-10. Pushed the new 6.21 build to
>> Fedora-10 stable so it should hit the repo as an update on release.
>> Koji build is
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=937384
>>
>> -olpc-netutils 0.7-1.fc9
>> +olpc-netutils 0.4-2.fc10
>>
>> - Merged the changed from F-9 to F-10. Pushed the new 0.7 build to
>> Fedora-10 stable so it should hit the repo as an update on release.
>> Koji build is
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=937235
>>
>> -olpc-utils 0.89-1.olpc3
>> +olpc-utils 0.84.29.20080820git1d35c4-1.olpc3
>>
>> - Merged the changed from F-9 to F-10. Pushed the new 0.89 build to
>> Fedora-10 stable so it should hit the repo as an update on release.
>> Koji build is
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=937414
>
>> I should get more time on Wednesday to continue through the list. I'll
>> be adding any bugs I file against the tracker bug which can be found
>> here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462625
>>
>> Let me know if there's anything else I need to know.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter

Wow, sounds really awesome work!

Thanks,

Tomeu