katzj at redhat.com
Mon Nov 3 10:22:00 EST 2008
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 06:27 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 20:57 +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 04:28:15AM -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > If you'll allow me to barge in on this conversation for but a moment...
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468744
> > By all means. Thanks. hal-info is version 20080508+git20080601-1 on
> > debxo, and does not contain this fix. The existence of this bug
> > suggests it will be eventually fixed.
> Unfortunately a patch to hal-info isn't enough. See the bug it blocks
> for a few details. Fortunately Richard Hughes is on it, and a fix should
> show up in hal... soonish (OFW on x86 being a new thing and all).
Also, this is problematic because the OFW patches being used in the OLPC
kernel aren't upstream either. Which means yet more stuff in
upstream projects that is dependent on not upstreamed kernel
All of the efforts underway to use the XO outside of the original narrow
path makes it that much more clear that kernel changes need to be
aggressively being pushed upstream, not having that done far later... :/
 The battery do-not-poll stuff that already made its way into hal I
found out on Friday late afternoon is dependent on bits of the olpc
battery and power management code which aren't upstream at all :(
More information about the Devel