F9 rebase (was Re: Release process)

[Tomeu Vizoso]

Sure, that's the point.

I heard that issue was already solved and that olpc3-16 would be
coming out soon.

Is there anything I can do?

Thanks,

Tomeu

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<mpgritti at gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that afaik Sugar is not starting up at the moment in olpc-3. We
> should give dgilmore some help...
>
> Marco
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:45 AM, C. Scott Ananian <cscott at cscott.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> A broken build is not a bad thing, as long as there is still a stable
>>> version for people to use.  Linus' philosophy of development is valid
>>> here: the way to get bugs fixed is to get the code distributed.
>>>
>>> In my opinion, if the remaining bugs in the FC9 branch are small
>>> enough not to interfere with the sugar developer's work, there is no
>>> reason why they shouldn't start working with it.  The more people
>>> looking at that branch, the more people will be able to help Dennis
>>> pummel the bugs out of it.
>>
>> I agree with this. There's important performance work going on in
>> upstream projects (mozilla, cairo, poppler, etc) and we are having a
>> hard time following up.
>>
>> Some extra help when rebasing to new fedora versions won't be bad.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tomeu
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at lists.laptop.org
>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>>
>