Marvell microkernel

[Albert Cahalan]

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Alex Belits
<abelits at phobos.illtel.denver.co.us> wrote:

>  If Marvell can release "tangled source" for ARM code that depends on
> proprietary microkernel, it would be an ordinary porting effort to make it
> work without that microkernel.

Let go of that dream. Marvell is just giving excuses for
why they won't release the rest of the code. The true
reasons are not public, but likely: the code is a buggy
piece of crap that Marvell sees as being valuable IP.

That dream has already cost us dearly, and I think it
was intentional. People would have started work over
a year ago had they known how dishonest Marvell
would be.