OLPC config in salut in F9?

[Morgan Collett]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 17:03, Guillaume Desmottes
<guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:01, Guillaume Desmottes
>> <guillaume.desmottes at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Le mardi 24 juin 2008 à 17:36 -0700, Brian Pepple a écrit :
>> >> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 01:12 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
>> >> > Can we enable the OLPC-specific patches and config in telepathy-salut
>> >> > in F-9? We're rebasing OLPC builds on F-9 and it would be good to work
>> >> > in the F-9 branch and not need to fork.
>> >>
>> >> Does it make sense to have these patches in F9? I'm on vacation right
>> >> now, so I don't really have time to look at the patches.  If it makes
>> >> sense to have these in F9 in addition to OLPC, I don't have a problem
>> >> with you doing enabling it.
>> >
>> > Not really. These patches are ugly OLPC specific workarounds due to XO
>> > security model (Rainbow).
>> > Building Salut with --enable-olpc doesn't hurt though (Debian does).
>>
>> I asked Dennis about branching salut, and he recommended we try keep
>> everything in F-9 if possible. Is it feasible to put the rainbow
>> specific patches in such that they are enabled with a runtime option,
>> if built with --enable-olpc?
>
> Then it would be build time option and F9 users will have the patch
> applied anyway (which is not really a good idea).

Can we make it a runtime option?

Morgan