For review: NAND out of space patch.
Martin Langhoff
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 16:54:56 EDT 2008
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:05 AM, C. Scott Ananian <cscott at laptop.org> wrote:
> For the record, I oppose the unionfs solution for the "real fix",
Erik's solution is not the real fix but it is better than cjb's - if
he can get it going soon, even with a dialogue on start up saying
"delete something!" and the normal journal, we will be ahead of game.
cjb's solution faces the problem that we can run out of space on 2
likely scenarios
- large valuable document i am working on
- large unimportant download / movie cap
*If* the images out there already had ds-backup running, it would't be
such a problem :-/ so deleting user content for any reason is a dodgy
proposition.
> I prefer
> making the core sugar APIs robust against write failures so that the
> child can use the normal Sugar mechanisms to clean up and recover.
Not an either-or here. We need both the reliability in Sugar/Journal
and decent handling of "disk-full boot".
cheers,
m
--
martin.langhoff at gmail.com
martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting questions
- don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
More information about the Devel
mailing list