On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:00 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > > I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2 > > package and hence is a drop-in replacement. > > Oh ok, that make sense and I guess it's the case here... So do we want to use GConf2-dbus like we did for update1, or are we ok to stick with plain old GConf2 in 8.2?