Help! Summarizing the xulrunner situation in OLPC

Marco Pesenti Gritti mpgritti at
Wed Jul 16 13:54:20 EDT 2008

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Daniel Drake <dsd at> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 13:44 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> Daniel,
>> It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
>> in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
>> journal).  We didn't want the old gnomevfs library since that pulled in
>> the old bonobo horror as a dependency. I'm not familiar with libgnome,
>> and therefore have no opinion there.
> My mistake - we already ship gnome-vfs2 and are not dropping it. A sugar
> component actually requires it. Enabling gnome-vfs2 support in xulrunner
> should not be an issue.

In update.1 we shipped the DBus version of gnome-vfs2 (Nokia patches)
which didn't bring ORBit in. I'm not sure if that's still the case in


More information about the Devel mailing list