POT inconsistent against code for Record activity

[Brian Jordan]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <sayamindu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The main issue here seems to be the fact that the location of the
>> Record repository has changed (earlier, the Record POT was fetched
>> from a SVN repository). Is this going the repository from where
>> further Record development will be happening in the future ? In that
>> case, I'll switch over to the new repository.
>   From http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-July/006904.html,
> the latest source is obviously in git , but Daniel Drake could have
> official words on the move.

Dan, Sayamindu -- let's get Record moved out of Daniel's userspace and
into activities/ today, before we update any pointers to it.

Brian

>
> Cheers,
> /Korakurider
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sayamindu
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I noticed right now record-activity.po is based on old POT.
>>>
>>> Here is a record in the PO:
>>>   #: constants.py:106
>>>   #, python-format
>>>   msgid "%(1)s hours, %(2)s minutes, %(1)s seconds remaining"
>>>
>>> Apparently one of placeholders is incorrect, but this has been fixed in repo
>>> at the commit of
>>> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dsd/record;a=blob;f=po/Record.pot;hb=52e8f3ed365ff53e3fba2bb5a013559bedebdbc1
>>>
>>> Header of the PO declares "POT-Creation-Date: 2007-12-20 09:20-0500\n",
>>> that is even inconsistent to POT in git.
>>> (In your explanation, POT is generated on Pootle server from source code, right?
>>>  it seems not to work for this activity)
>>>
>>> Could you please take a look and fix it?  Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Translators:
>>>   You would need to review your translations after the correct POT is merged.
>>>
>>> Developers:
>>>    Currently POT is automatically generated by weekly batch job on
>>> Pootle server and is merged into each PO.
>>>    But it seems that few people monitoring it actually.
>>>    I would suggest you (at least owner of activities that is
>>> translated on Pootle) to check regularly if string changes have been
>>> correctly merged to POs.
>>>    Without that translator might work against wrong strings and it
>>> would result poor quality of product...
>>>
>>>    And I believe we need to document in our development process who
>>> to check/maintain the consistency,
>>>    while I don't know who is the right one.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> /Korakurider
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sayamindu Dasgupta
>> [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>