(another) WebKit port of Browse
bobbypowers at gmail.com
Mon Jul 7 19:24:16 EDT 2008
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Carol Lerche <cafl at msbit.com> wrote:
> The UI seems pretty important to me, but obviously that's a matter of
> taste. Not everyone likes tabbed browsing. Correct operation of websites
> that fail with the extant browser. Direct availability of plugins and
> addons. One example: scrapbook, a superb research tool. Another example
> Google Gears (according to a recent mail being ported, presumably because
> the browser is not standard). I am not familiar with the Firefox codebase,
> and perhaps all these things are directly available so long as the Firefox 3
> engine is there, but if so, there desperately needs to be a detailed body of
> documentation telling how to access these capabilities.
I created a page on the wiki to list these problem sites. Can you
please record these sites there?
And, to be fair, Gears is not (only) a website, its a browser plug-in
that allows you to interact with certain websites offline. (and I do
think someone is working on porting it as you said).
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Bobby Powers <bobbypowers at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/7/7 Carol Lerche <cafl at msbit.com>:
>> > Client certs can be used for authentication with no changes to a Firefox
>> > browser or an Apache server. GTK based as well as web based software to
>> > create certs also already exists. What sort of patch are you looking
>> > for?
>> > I could certainly provide a page running in an apache server to validate
>> > a
>> > request for and implant a client cert in a Firefox browser. The issue
>> > of
>> > certificate creation needs a little more discussion, not because it is
>> > difficult or requires a lot of new software to execute, but because it
>> > is
>> > important to be clear about the requirements. When you describe the
>> > overhead, do you mean the overhead of creating the certs? Examining
>> > them
>> > when someone first logs on?
>> > I raised this alternative because you said that a bespoke browser was a
>> > requirement to have automatic authentication with the school server. To
>> > me,
>> > the benefits of running a standard browser are so substantial that this
>> > trade off should be considered.
>> Can you explain these benefits? Both Gecko and WebKit are standard
>> browser engines. I don't see much to be gained from a UI perspective
>> (which presumably is what you're taking about?) by switching to FF3.
>> Performance is the only compelling reason I see.
>> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Martin Langhoff
>> > <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Carol Lerche <cafl at msbit.com> wrote:
>> >> > Why does automatic authentication require a custom browser? Client
>> >> > certificates work well for this function in ordinary web applications
>> >> > (assuming a properly configured server).
>> >> I haven't delved into this deeply yet, but I suspect that, while I am
>> >> fond of client certs, they won't work - SSL network and CPU overhead
>> >> and sidestepping PKI madness for server certs. More on this when I get
>> >> to implement it.
>> >> Now, anyone who wants to have a strong say on how I am developing this
>> >> is free to start implementing it ahead of me, and showing me some
>> >> fantastic patches :-)
>> >> cheers,
>> >> m
>> >> --
>> >> martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>> >> martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
>> >> - ask interesting questions
>> >> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
>> >> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>> > --
>> > Frisbeetarianism is the belief that when you die, your soul goes up on
>> > the
>> > roof and gets stuck -- George Carlin
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Devel mailing list
>> > Devel at lists.laptop.org
>> > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
> Frisbeetarianism is the belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the
> roof and gets stuck -- George Carlin
More information about the Devel