(another) WebKit port of Browse

[Carol Lerche]

Why does automatic authentication require a custom browser?  Client
certificates work well for this function in ordinary web applications
(assuming a properly configured server).

As to collaborative browsing, that use case should be balanced against all
the available applications that having a standard Firefox enables
painlessly.   Where is a user story of collaborative browsing (as contrasted
to a shared bookmark repository) documented?

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian <cscott at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> > I'd rather see us just give up on Browse and ship and appropriately
> > configured Firefox.  I just can't see OLPC devoting enough developer
>
> Not so fast! The XS deliverables need a custom browser on the XO for
> reasons we were discussing last Thursday :-)
>
> If we want
>
>  - automagic authentication with the XS
>  - collaborative browsing (which can get better than what we have)
>
> we need a custom, bespoke, forked, evil, lasers-on-sharkies-heads
> browser. Call it Betty if you want, but we need it.
>
>
>
>
> m
> --
>  martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>  martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Frisbeetarianism is the belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the
roof and gets stuck -- George Carlin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080707/fda0a20c/attachment.html>