jhbuild failure: evince-olpc --> evince

[Jani Monoses]

Anything planned on this?

Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1.
> 
> Marco
> 
> On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres <reinier at heeres.eu> wrote:
>> Jani,
>>
>> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like
>> this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source.
>> The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new
>> options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to just build things
>> relevant for an embedded version. You can check out the modifications in
>> my git repo: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/rwh/evince;a=summary
>>
>> Maybe we can discuss this on IRC? I'm rwh there in #olpc and #sugar.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reinier
>>
>> Jani Monoses wrote:
>>
>>> Reinier Heeres wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jani,
>>>>
>>>> Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already
>>>>
>>> I was referring to the GNOME svn upstream, and whether plain evince
>>> tarballs will be usable for wrapping in sugar if built with certain
>>> configure options. I'd like to reuse as many of the existing system
>>> packages for ubuntu debs and I suppose most distros which will include
>>> sugar would will as little duplication of upstream packages as well.
>>>
>>> Jani
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel at lists.laptop.org
>>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at lists.laptop.org
>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>>