Plural-Forms header in sugar-toolkit.po (Re: Plural form in timestamp of Journal entry)

[Sayamindu Dasgupta]

I added some plural information manually for certain files: I used the
data from http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/l10n/pluralforms
Thanks,
Sayamindu


On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Sayamindu
>
> Today I noticed there is Plural-Forms header in sugar-toolkit.po that
> had been missing and affected timestamp display in Journal  (see
> #8086)
> But X-Generator and POT-Creation-Date haven't been changed.   How can
> we know the changes...
> So what did you change actually?
>
> And I believe we want to do mass-push them for inclusion to 8.2 build !
>
> /Korakurider
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <sayamindu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah - same here. The logs seem to indicate a problem with the strong
>>>>> formatting - I have attached one.
>>>>> Tomeu, any ideas ?
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> ELAPSED = _('%s ago')
>>>>
>>>> Seems like the translated string has one (or more) extra placeholder?
>>>
>>>   Thanks, this seems the case (http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8058#comment:5).
>>   My bad, this is the case, thanks!
>>
>>>
>>>   Other than that, how Plural is handled without Plural-Forms is
>>> still in question.
>>    My test shows we need to specify Plural-Forms header explicitly in PO.
>>    http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8086
>>
>>    This should affect some languages how timestamp is shown in Journal...
>>    Folks, please verify it for your language.
>>
>> /Korakurider
>>>
>>> /Korakurider
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Tomeu
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



-- 
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]