Terminals

[Benjamin M. Schwartz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eben Eliason wrote:
| Is it possible that we could
| simply have a P_ROOT permission as well, or does that blow Bitfrost out of
| the water?

It's called P_SF_RUN or P_SF_CORE, depending on what you mean by root.  In
other words, yes, this was planned.

We need an interface that allows users to specify which Activities can run
with which permissions.
To build that, we need Rainbow to support different running different
Activities with different permissions.
To build that, we need Activities to be identified by a unique secure token.
To build that, we need a new bundle format.

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiTnPsACgkQUJT6e6HFtqSMZQCfcMSVCMON075fA/uuHedDAvas
UwwAnAgj38pi0eRjVKsjzsiVV8PMSnkZ
=E5dh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----