Build Debate: Followup on Build Naming

[C. Scott Ananian]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Charles Merriam
<charles.merriam at gmail.com> wrote:
>  After a small novel worth of posts about having time-based release
>  numbers, the push from those that make that choice seem to be to have
>  function based release numbers.   The time-based release number was my
>  minimum buy-in as stated, so I'll bow out of build and release
>  problems for another year.

I've given up, and I'm just calling it the "August release" until we
decide who makes the decisions around here.
 --scott

-- 
 ( http://cscott.net/ )