Journal Suggestions
Mikus Grinbergs
mikus at bga.com
Tue Apr 29 18:35:43 EDT 2008
> The SD card
> is deliberately made difficult to remove. If someone buys and installs
> an SD card perhaps it should be considered a part of the Journal
> itself. More like buying a second hard drive for your system than
> plugging in something removeable. So now I have just one Journal with
> 2.5 gigs free instead of 500 megs free. That's the way I was hoping to
> use the SD card when I got it.
I have a significant problem with the <lack of> speed of the OLPC.
Even on NAND, if I (manually, in Terminal) copy a 5 MB file from one
place to another, it takes seconds and seconds (as opposed to a
desktop, where such a transfer happens in the blink of an eye).
I have not tried any measurements, but my concern is that with an
external device (*particularly* an SD card), access is even slower
than with NAND. [And SD cards come in several speed ranges - the
cheapest are usually the slowest). Empirically, I haven't noticed
'olpc-update' being significantly faster from an USB stick than over
the internet.
What raises my concern about treating an SD card as an extension of
the Journal is - how fast will the XO be once there are a great many
items for it to keep track of?
I don't use 'suspend'; but the few times I've tried it - typically
when attempting 'resume', my "Power" light stays on for more than
three seconds, then goes back to blinking (in other words, the
"un-suspend" times out). I suspect some of those seconds are being
spent accessing the 100 or so files on my SD card. [Would be nice
if the OLPC had a 'Storage Device Busy' light for me to look at.]
What will be the performance of the OLPC (including: how long will
it take to boot?) when I have several thousand files on my SD card?
mikus
More information about the Devel
mailing list