Auto backlight management?
Benjamin M. Schwartz
bmschwar at fas.harvard.edu
Fri Apr 25 01:54:03 EDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jordan Crouse wrote:
| On 24/04/08 22:10 -0700, david at lang.hm wrote:
|> this is the one drawback to the fantasic screen, any light from the
|> backlight that gets through is colored by the screen. it can be made to
|> appear white by allowing all three colors through, but it's still colored.
|>
|> this means that you can't get high resolution mode with the backlight on.
|
| No part of that is true. The behavior you describe is a myth,
| kept alive by people who misinterpet the display specification.
|
| You can turn on monochrome mode at any time. Try it yourself:
| echo "1" > /sys/devices/platform/dcon/output
|
| Boom - there you go. Monochrome for your pleasure.
Nope. Take out your magnifying glass and look: each pixel is either red,
green, or blue, even in monochrome mode. Those are not software-controlled
filters; they're formed by a fixed physical diffraction grating.
Monochrome mode just tells the software to set R=G=B, but with the
backlight on only one of those three is actually displayed at each pixel.
(This may just be a miscommunication, but we might as well be clear.)
One amusing question is: could software potentially set monochrome mode
and then use fancy color-adaptive subpixel rendering to do optimized
display of fonts and images? Maybe, but at 200 dpi the gains would be
small, and the computational overhead would be huge.
- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIEXH7UJT6e6HFtqQRAiVKAKCdNl5z/A5scDGndbPHZ1Xvn0LOlQCfSDGP
BBDUVl4Ybh2emEb8tVVczmQ=
=x4XP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Devel
mailing list