[Community-news] where is Walter?
Stephen John Smoogen
smooge at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 23:18:36 EDT 2008
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Chris Preimesberger
> <cpreimesberger at comcast.net> wrote:
> > Walter, you have been a shining light of good information for all this
> > time, and it's sad to see you pull away from the project. Sad to see
> > the project melting away, too -- at least that's my impression.
> >
>
> One standard thing I have seen is that every project goes through
> these cycles. Developers/leaders leave a company, project or group
> and the people who identified the project with those people post that
> the project as "shriveling up and dying". I remember people saying
> this of Debian, early Linux kernel development, Red Hat, SuSE, GNOME,
> KDE, etc. Sometimes its true, but mostly its a gut reaction because
> our brains are wired to identify with 'leaders' for our survival. If
> our leaders leave the tribe.. we should go with them. Its a deep urge
> we all have but it is rarely rooted in 'reality' but in the minds way
> of coming up with 'reasons'.
>
> I am just commenting on this because its something I have seen over
> and over again with companies, projects, and groups.. and it
> interested me why one day I was all happy to be working for a company
> and 2 days later was ready to leave because it was going to crap when
> a developer I worked under left.
>
> The big thing I learned was that companies, projects, groups, etc
> change constantly, and people who thrive under some conditions
> deteriorate under others.. and have to leave. And when that happens,
> there are a lot of psychological shifts in the group where other
> people stay and leave because various 'leaders' stayed or left.. in
> some cases you end up with large scisms where people will no longer
> talk with each other, and in other cases you have people agreeing to
> disagree on where each group is going.
>
On the other hand, comments from the AP article can make me eat crow :)
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hXa0O9XLMsWfaqt-sI9FqFy2IewgD9074MH82
For about a year, however, Microsoft has been working to get a
slimmed-down version of Windows to run on XO laptops. As a result,
Negroponte said Tuesday that he expects XOs to soon have a "dual-boot"
option, meaning users would be able to run Windows or Sugar.
One current hang-up is whether the necessary hardware would add $7 to
$12 to an XO's cost, taking the project even further away from its
eventual goal of producing the machines for less than $100.
Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating
system, and Sugar would be educational software running on top of it.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
More information about the Devel
mailing list