TamTam packaging

[Olivier Bélanger]

Le 08-04-17 à 02:49, Jani Monoses a écrit :
>>> -why are the cpp sources in the MANIFEST and consequently in the xo?
>>
>> At the beginning we TamTam was only one activity with a welcome
>> screen to choose which component to play with. When we were aksed to
>> spilt the activities it was the simplest way for us to manage all
>> activities from one git tree. But all sounds and common images are
>> located only inside TamTamEdit.
>
> Ok. But are the c++ sources in common/Util/Clooper/ needed in the  
> final xo?

No.

>
>>
>>> -which versions do you recommend for packaging. Latest are 48 and  
>>> 49 ,
>>> depending on the activity
>>
>> Always the latest... even though i'm on the way to make major changes
>> in the way TamTam handle resources (mic recording, synthlab
>> sounds...) to respect OLPC security policy. These changes will
>> complicate once more the port to others system...
>>
>>> I got them to build and start on Ubuntu but I have no sound
>>>
>>> The lib is acsound64 not acsound in debian/ubuntu so the link flag
>>> needed a change to rebuild the aclient.so instead of using the one
>>> in git.
>>
>> I don't think using the aclient is the better way to make it work on
>> Debian. This client was build very tight to save cpu cycles on the
>> XO. The better way is to use the Python API for Csound... (with the
>> API, don't forget to remove -n flag (no sound) in tamtamorc.csd).
>> Maybe James can tell you more about aclient.so
>
> I did not look closely so did not realize that python-csound is not
> used. Anyway I'd rather keep changes from the XO version at a minimum
> for now and not add extra code. The goal is to get it working first.

When tested on jhbuild, we've got erratic sound.Good luck!

>
>
> One important issue I forgot to mention yesterday: there are no
> licensing headers or copyright files in the sources except in
> Clooper/audio.cpp which comes from ALSA.
>
> Can you when time permits add any kind of copyright notice along the
> source files? It is impossible to upload to either Debian or Ubuntu
> otherwise.

Absolutely! Thanks for the warning...

>
> thank you
> Jani
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel