Build Debate: Followup on Build Naming

Thu Apr 10 11:48:56 EDT 2008

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:32:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday 10 April 2008, Charles Merriam wrote:
> > I strongly suggest we keep the year.
>  I strongly feel that we should not put the year in releases.

How about a two digit (zero-padded) version number that started with 08?

> Dennis

Martin

PS - HHOS
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080410/97bcc41b/attachment.sig>