[Testing] New OLPC Process and Rules for Builing Activities, Releases, and Firmware Builds

[Samuel Klein]

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Charles Merriam <charles.merriam at gmail.com>
wrote:

> April Fool's was a good way to present what does eventually need to be
> done, and what is done in some other open source projects.
>
> It's a good way of doing it, and would require some work.  I would set
> up a set of stages with the highest and easiest pay-offs first, e.g.
> building versions with and without activities and with and without
> source would be easy.   I don't know how to implement some of the
> features, especially code coverage metrics.
>
> Does anyone believe OLPC Foundation is up to this style of change?
>

It is certainly worth discussing, which is why Scott added it to the
schedule for tomorrow's discussion.  If youa re free around 13:30 EST to
present it yourself via the dialin number, that would be ideal; otherwise
someone else will present for you (though perhaps not as passionately) and
you can read the results in the minutes...

SJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080404/c5ed9703/attachment.html>