#3506 BLOC Trial-3: XOs connected to jabber server AND can link local don't share well
Kim Quirk
kim at laptop.org
Thu Sep 20 09:47:57 EDT 2007
Hi Simon,
I agree with your request to 'see' more information in the short term
because it is nearly impossible to debug. I believe we needed this bug to be
fixed because sharing just didn't work in some cases; but you are correct
that without knowing if you are connected to a school server or not; and
without being able to choose to connect to a specific jabber server or none,
there will be confusion.
We are working on the requirements for a Control Panel that can let you
choose your jabber server. Maybe it should also let you choose NOT to
connect to a jabber server so you can only talk to other XOs that not
connected to any server (and they can choose not to be connected).
I want to see if we can get the most basic aspects of a control panel in by
FRS (even if it doesn't get a real UI) so that we can have a little more
insight and a little more control that we have right now.
Kim
On 9/20/07, Zarro Boogs per Child <bugtracker at laptop.org> wrote:
>
> #3506: XOs connected to jabber server AND can link local don't share well
>
> -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
> Reporter: kimquirk | Owner: J5
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: blocker | Milestone: Trial-3
> Component: presence-service | Version:
> Resolution: | Keywords: review+
> Verified: 0 |
>
> -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
>
> Comment(by smcv):
>
> (I should note that turning off Salut like this when we have a server
> connection doesn't do anything to address any concerns you may have about
> network traffic caused by Salut - as I explained in an email thread a
> month or so ago, most of Salut's network traffic will already have
> happened by the time you connect to the server and turn Salut off.)
>
> The fundamental UI problem here is that we don't give the child any
> indication or control of whether the activity will be shared locally, or
> on the server, we don't give them that information about activities they
> can see, and we don't show them whether they and their buddies can see the
> server or not; but the observable behaviour is inexplicably different,
> depending on these things.
>
> I realise hiding irrelevant technical details from the children is a goal,
> but perhaps for 1.1 it would make things clearer if the sharing UI could
> distinguish between local and server sharing (People Near Me vs My School
> perhaps?), and add a badge or other scope indication to
> activities/buddies, or something?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <https://dev.laptop.org/ticket/3506#comment:11>
> One Laptop Per Child <https://dev.laptop.org>
> OLPC bug tracking system
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070920/6a2809fe/attachment.html>
More information about the Devel
mailing list