New joyride build 131

[Bert Freudenberg]

Pah, looks like it tried every 15 minutes over night but did not stop  
sending out mails ...

I now changed the script to only send out mail when a new successful  
build is found that actually has any changed package versions.

- Bert -

On Oct 28, 2007, at 22:24 , Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> The script now looks explicitly for "Calling out the done script"  
> to indicate success or "Deleting incomplete OS image" for failure.  
> If neither line is found, it tries again 15 minutes later.
>
> And since you're back to normal schedule I enabled the message for  
> every build ...
>
> - Bert -
>
> On Oct 28, 2007, at 21:55 , Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
>> I just re-reran it and it picked up those builds fine. I suspect a
>> race - it detects the new build directory, but the log is not up yet.
>> I'll see if I can avoid the race ...
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2007, at 21:49 , Michael Stone wrote:
>>
>>> Bert,
>>>
>>> Builds joyride-129 and joyride-131 look finished to me but your  
>>> script
>>> reported them as failed.
>>>
>>> This is probably due to changes that I made recently (#4251 and  
>>> #4253)
>>> but I don't know enough about how your script works to be certain.
>>>
>>> Do you have any ideas on what's going on?
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> P.S. - Mitch - we were firing off builds frequently today because
>>> Scott
>>> and I made fairly significant implementation changes over the  
>>> last two
>>> days that, unfortunately, did not work when run in the environment
>>> provided by cron.
>>>
>>> The new implementation of the dropbox scanner seems to be  
>>> functioning
>>> correctly now, so we should be back to our regularly scheduled
>>> programming. (no pun intended, of course :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:38:42PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 28, 2007, at 21:34 , Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mitch Bradley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps we should reconsider the wisdom of hourly builds, or quit
>>>>>> sending hourly change reports, or something.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ...or not running new builds unless the datestamps of the source
>>>>> directories say something has changed?
>>>>
>>>> I thought that was the case?
>>>>
>>>>> But anyway, I always wanted some way to do "I want a build now"
>>>>> so I don't have to wait 30" on average to see if my changes work.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I changed the mail notifications to not send out a message
>>>> for failed builds for now.
>>>>
>>>> - Bert -
>>>>
>
>