Ivan's XO Field Upgrade Proposal
dcbw at redhat.com
Tue Jun 26 12:32:57 EDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 12:16 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On 6/26/07, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Downside of this is, as Alex pointed out, it'll load the mesh a _lot_
> > more than XO->XO updates.
> Not necessarily. Rsync is pretty efficient: we're still basically
> distributing just (blockwise) diffs. And we can always do XO-to-XO
> later: the important thing is to get a rock-solid basis. The selling
> point (to me) is the simplicity. Like I said: its the simplest thing
> that works.
I'm not arguing simplicity; just that we have to be aware of the
implications of having lots of XOs pulling from the server with some
overlap with this method, but we don't with XO->XO. We just have to
make the tradeoffs clear, and understand them.
> I can do some benchmarks if people actually need to see numbers.
More information about the Devel