Ivan's XO Field Upgrade Proposal
C. Scott Ananian
cscott at laptop.org
Tue Jun 26 12:16:31 EDT 2007
On 6/26/07, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> Downside of this is, as Alex pointed out, it'll load the mesh a _lot_
> more than XO->XO updates.
Not necessarily. Rsync is pretty efficient: we're still basically
distributing just (blockwise) diffs. And we can always do XO-to-XO
later: the important thing is to get a rock-solid basis. The selling
point (to me) is the simplicity. Like I said: its the simplest thing
I can do some benchmarks if people actually need to see numbers.
( http://cscott.net/ )
More information about the Devel