Ivan's XO Field Upgrade Proposal

[C. Scott Ananian]

On 6/26/07, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> Downside of this is, as Alex pointed out, it'll load the mesh a _lot_
> more than XO->XO updates.

Not necessarily.  Rsync is pretty efficient: we're still basically
distributing just (blockwise) diffs.  And we can always do XO-to-XO
later: the important thing is to get a rock-solid basis.  The selling
point (to me) is the simplicity.  Like I said: its the simplest thing
that works.

I can do some benchmarks if people actually need to see numbers.
 --scott

-- 
                         ( http://cscott.net/ )