"Could not activate this XO" error
Dan Williams
dcbw at redhat.com
Sun Jul 22 23:19:20 EDT 2007
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 20:54 -0400, Kim Quirk wrote:
> Thanks Mitch! I didn't know that.
>
> Do you think that is the best way to do the downgrade? I already
> changed the Autoreinstallation page to the notes I above. The possible
> problem at the end of the downgrade didn't sound good; and we are
> going to start using stable release numbers >1000, so if you do change
> it back, please keep that in mind.
you rename the nandXXXX.xxx files to something like nand60000.img and
nand60000.crc, and change the build # to 60000 in olpc.fth. OFW
compares the version it finds in olpc.fth to the version it sees in the
existing OS on the NAND, so regardless of what build # is in the
nandXXXX files, it'll overwrite the NAND if you make the olpc.fth
version higher than what's on the NAND.
Dan
> Thanks,
> Kim
>
> On 7/22/07, Mitch Bradley <wmb at laptop.org> wrote:
> Kim Quirk wrote:
> > I don't recommend that your rename your nand to a higher
> build number
> > than it actually is just to avoid a downgrade. You may never
> be able
> > to catch up (or catch back down to the proper version).
> >
>
> Renaming the installation file does not change the version
> number that
> is actually stored in the NAND FLASH as a result of the
> installation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
More information about the Devel
mailing list