Early boot, activation, upgrades

[Ivan Krstić]

On Jul 11, 2007, at 3:50 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> It wasn't obvious how to coerce the code to do 256-bit truncated
> Whirlpool, so I don't have a number for that.

Whirlpool doesn't matter for the general boot case anyway. Looks like  
if we go with SHA-256 and ECC-256 we can do the verification in about  
0.6 seconds, which is fine by me.

--
Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | http://radian.org