[PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem
ron minnich
rminnich at gmail.com
Thu Jan 11 14:11:32 EST 2007
On 1/11/07, Stefan Reinauer <stepan at coresystems.de> wrote:
> This works fine for just passing the device tree, but it will fail for
> the next step of being able to use the firmware in the OS, and returning
> sanely to the firmware.
And why is it we need to do that, presently? And how, in a virtualized
environment, for example, would you plan to support this calling into
firmware? (I sort of know how IBM does it, I am wondering how OFW
would plan to do it).
We can standardize passing a device tree structure across a very wide
range of environments. But supporting callbacks is necessarily going
to be a much smaller range of environments. It sounds, however, like
it will be possible to do both the callback and non-callback cases, so
I think I'm fine with that anyway. I will wait for Segher's patch.
thanks
ron
More information about the Devel
mailing list