Status of SVG rendering on the XO
Ed Trager
ed.trager at gmail.com
Fri Dec 21 10:49:59 EST 2007
IMO LivelyKernel is unacceptably slow even on Safari on faster
hardware than what XO has.
However other web app toolkits are not as heavy weight --or slow-- as
Lively Kernel.
For example, I and a colleague of mine have been working on a
javascript GUI app development toolkit that uses standard XTHML
div-based rendering for most things, but uses SVG when SVG is clearly
the right answer.
Using such a hybrid approach, one can achieve much better performance:
For example, http://eyegene.ophthy.med.umich.edu/madeline/webservice.php
is a demonstration web service built using our toolkit.
A question to ask might be, when will the XO get updated to use FF3's
new rendering engine? The new engine is supposed to be faster,
although I have not found that to really be the case on our machines.
- Ed
On Dec 21, 2007 1:28 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2007, at 21:06 , Jake B wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> > I am expecting to get my XO laptop in the mail any day now. I was
> > hoping someone could tell me, does the XO ship with with an SVG
> > renderer? I'm wondering if it would be possible to develop rich
> > apps in SVG and ECMAscript for deployment on the XO.
> > I remember that there used to be an entry on SVG on the wiki, but
> > it appears to have been taken down...
> > Please let me know. Thanks.
>
> It works - but depending on the complexity of your app it gets rather
> slow.
>
> For example, even Lively Kernel worked, which is a full in-browser
> application development environment:
>
> http://research.sun.com/projects/lively/
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
More information about the Devel
mailing list