#2819 NORM Trial-3: need way to make a non-sharable activity

[Eben Eliason]

>
> It isn't clear that making the popdown insensitive is the right
> solution. Why should it appear at all if there is no sharing?


Interesting point.  An arguable benefit (as long as it remains an option
menu) is that it still clearly indicates that the activity is private.  It's
function as a label could still be valid.  In general I agree, though.  If
there is NO way to make the control sensitive at all, then it seems it
shouldn't even exist.

Of course, there is some question as to whether or not we'll keep the menu
anyway, or if we'll resort to a palette button (so that Sugar can render the
resulting palette itself) in the future.

- Eben


-walter
>
> On 8/16/07, Zarro Boogs per Child <bugtracker at laptop.org> wrote:
> > #2819: need way to make a non-sharable activity
> > --------------------------+---------------------------------
> ----------------
> >   Reporter:  erikb        |       Owner:  marco
> >       Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  closed
> >   Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  Trial-3
> >  Component:  sugar        |     Version:  Build 542
> > Resolution:  fixed        |    Keywords:
> >   Verified:  0            |
> > --------------------------+---------------------------------
> ----------------
> > Changes (by marco):
> >
> >   * status:  new => closed
> >   * resolution:  => fixed
> >
> > Comment:
> >
> >  Fixed. self.props.max_participants = 1 will make the popdown
> insensitive.
> >
> > --
> > Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2819#comment:5>
> > One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> One Laptop per Child
> http://laptop.org
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070816/3f4ae81b/attachment.html>