[Trac #100] OLPC GX SKU should be evaluated from an energy consumption standpoint

Ronald G Minnich rminnich at lanl.gov
Tue Sep 12 10:40:04 EDT 2006


Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
> #100: OLPC GX SKU should be evaluated from an energy consumption standpoint
> ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  tsylla    |        Owner:  jg       
>      Type:  defect    |       Status:  closed   
>  Priority:  high      |    Milestone:  rev1 beta
> Component:  hardware  |   Resolution:  fixed    
>  Keywords:            |  
> ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
> Changes (by mfoster):
> 
>   * status:  new => closed
>   * resolution:  => fixed
> 
> Comment:
> 
>  Replying to [comment:1 tsylla]:
>  > Note that LB has actually been the setting the 400/266 SKU the whole
>  time. Assigned to jg to figure out what OLPC wants, and then it needs to
>  be driven to LB.
> 
>  OLPC was initially targeting the 400/266 configuration, but AMD
>  specifically told us to move to the 366/244 configuration (I can email you
>  details).  That's the correct answer.
> 
>  Best Regards,
>  MarkF
> 

ok, this is closed, but how is it fixed? We're still at 400/266 right?

ron



More information about the Devel mailing list