[Trac #100] OLPC GX SKU should be evaluated from an energy consumption standpoint
Ronald G Minnich
rminnich at lanl.gov
Tue Sep 12 10:40:04 EDT 2006
Zarro Boogs per Child wrote:
> #100: OLPC GX SKU should be evaluated from an energy consumption standpoint
> ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: tsylla | Owner: jg
> Type: defect | Status: closed
> Priority: high | Milestone: rev1 beta
> Component: hardware | Resolution: fixed
> Keywords: |
> ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
> Changes (by mfoster):
>
> * status: new => closed
> * resolution: => fixed
>
> Comment:
>
> Replying to [comment:1 tsylla]:
> > Note that LB has actually been the setting the 400/266 SKU the whole
> time. Assigned to jg to figure out what OLPC wants, and then it needs to
> be driven to LB.
>
> OLPC was initially targeting the 400/266 configuration, but AMD
> specifically told us to move to the 366/244 configuration (I can email you
> details). That's the correct answer.
>
> Best Regards,
> MarkF
>
ok, this is closed, but how is it fixed? We're still at 400/266 right?
ron
More information about the Devel
mailing list