[OLPC-devel] csound package submitted to Fedora Extras

[Dan Williams]

On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Simon Schampijer wrote:

> Dan,
> 
> thanks for your work. Did you took the main csound5 code or is there 
> Barrys and my code included? We were working on a seperate branch and it 
> is possible/likely that the olpc csound code changes form the main 
> csound5 branch. I do not know if Barry has got still in mind to make a 
> fixed point version of csound for olpc. for example.

I used the Csound 5.03.0 sources from sourceforge.  I saw there were some config 
options related to floating point <-> integer conversion, are those anything to 
worry about?  In any case, I haven't done anything specific with your and 
Barry's code; so if you've got a patch we'll need to bring that in.

A few questions I came up with:

a) What bits require Tk, and was that just a case of somebody writing a tool in 
the language they knew?
b) What is lib_csnd.so and how does it differ from libcsound.so?  Why two?
c) Why does csound redefine printf()?  That leads to compile warnings on pretty 
much every file.
d) Should there be init scripts to start csound up when the machine starts?

Dan

> Simon
> 
> Dan Williams schrieb:
> > I've cleaned up and submitted the csound package to Fedora Extras.  Once
> > it passes review we should be able to pull it into the image builds
> > automatically.
> > 
> > If anyone with access to a 64-bit Fedora system could grab the SRPM from
> > the submission report here and try to build the package, that would be
> > greatly appreciated.  Doing a 64-bit build of Csound is, um, odd, and
> > I'd like to verify that stuff ends up in the right place.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel at laptop.org
> > http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > 
> 
>