[Colombia] Fwd: [sugar] on Sugar

[Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nicholas Negroponte <nn at media.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Subject: [sugar] on Sugar
To: devel at laptop.org, sugar at laptop.org, community-news at laptop.org



People keep asking me:

Yes, OLPC's commitment to Sugar has changed. It is now larger, not smaller.
Contrary to inferences drawn by Walter's departure, the press and venerable
sources such as OLPC News, we are scaling Sugar up, not down. Let me
explain.

Sugar is a very good idea, less than perfectly executed. I attribute our
weakness to unrealistic development goals and practices. Our mission has
never changed. It has been to bring connected laptops for learning to
children in the poorest and most remote locations of the world. Our mission
has never been to advocate the perfect learning model or pure Open Source. I
believe the best educational tool is constructionism and the best software
development method is Open Source. In some cases those are best achieved
like the Trojan Horse, versus direct confrontation or isolating ourselves
with perfection. Remember the expression: *perfection is the enemy of good*.
We need to reach the most children possible and leverage *them* as the
agents of change. It makes no sense for us to search for the perfect
learning model.

For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux platforms
and to run under Windows. We have been engaged in discussions with Microsoft
for several months, to explore a dual boot version of the XO. Some of you
have seen what Microsoft developed on their own for the XO. It works well
and now needs Sugar on top of it (so to speak).

As a non-profit, humanitarian organization, OLPC has a unique position, from
which it can change the world for children and learning. Laptop makers
rushing into the low-end marketplace is a perfect example of success of one
kind. Another will be what kids do outside school and with other kids around
the world. A third is what we do.

We are not a business, but need to be more business-like: meet schedules,
manage expectations and fulfill promises. To do that, we need to hire more
developers, work more together and spend less time arguing. Because of
public attention, anything we say will be quoted out of context. We can only
speak with our actions and those are only one: a reliable and ubiquitous
Sugar. That includes being more collaborative engineers ourselves and
engaging the community better. Our limitations are not financial, but
identifying the required human resources and resolve to do so.

What is in front of us is an opportunity for big change. Sugar is at the
core of it. To pretend otherwise would be a joke. That said, Sugar needs to
be disentangled. I keep using the omelet analogy, claiming it needs to be a
fried egg, with distinct yoke and white, rather than having the UI,
collaborative tools, power management and radios merge into one amorphous
blob. Otherwise, it is impossible to debug and will be limited to the small,
albeit growing, world of the XO hardware platform.

As we reach out to engage a wider community, some purism has to morph into
pragmatism. To suggest that this forsakes Open Source or redirects our
mission is absurd. Kids will be the agents of change and our job is to reach
the most of them. That is not just selling laptops, but making Sugar as
robust and widely available as possible.

Nicholas


_______________________________________________
Sugar mailing list
Sugar at lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar




-- 
Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
One Laptop Per Child
rafael at laptop.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/colombia/attachments/20080423/a8b040a9/attachment.htm