[Code-review] review: Gadget act-props branch
Dafydd Harries
dafydd.harries at collabora.co.uk
Mon Aug 11 09:07:21 EDT 2008
act-props:
>+ properties = activity_elem.addElement((ns.ACTIVITY_PROP, 'properties'))
>+ for node in properties_to_xml(activity.properties):
>+ properties.addChild(node)
We seem to do this a lot. Let's change it so properties_to_xml returns the
<properties> element, then we can just say:
activity_elem.addChild(properties_to_xml(activity.properties))
>+ for child in node.elements():
>+ if child.uri == ns.ACTIVITY_PROP and child.name == 'properties':
>+ for child in child.elements():
>+ assert child.name == 'property'
I think it's better to just ignore unexpected elements:
for child in child.elements():
if child.name != 'property':
continue
We could have a convenience function:
def elem_find_children(elem, uri, name):
for child in elem.elements():
if (child.uri, child.name) == (uri, name):
yield child
...
So we could then write:
for child in elem_find_chidlren(ns.ACTIVITY_PROP, 'property'):
...
This also handles namespaces more correctly.
Otherwise, looks fine.
--
Dafydd
More information about the Code-review
mailing list