#10981 NORM 11.3.0: XO-1.5 C5 via camera kernel messages
Zarro Boogs per Child
bugtracker at laptop.org
Tue Jul 26 20:11:51 EDT 2011
#10981: XO-1.5 C5 via camera kernel messages
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: Quozl | Owner: corbet
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 11.3.0
Component: kernel | Version: Development build as of this date
Resolution: | Keywords:
Next_action: diagnose | Verified: 0
Deployment_affected: | Blockedby:
Blocking: |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Old description:
> During runin test on 11.2.0 build os22, over four hours, there are 10724
> messages from the kernel of which most are apparently triggered by the
> camera test.
>
> * 7304 instances of ''viafb-camera viafb-camera: Funky IRQ 90200022'',
> * 1865 instances of ''viafb-camera viafb-camera: Funky IRQ 90200020'',
> * 1481 instances of ''viacam_quick_irq: N callbacks suppressed'', where
> N ranges from 12 to 118, with the most frequent value 39.
>
> The camera test does this:
>
> {{{
> /usr/bin/gst-launch v4l2src ! ffmpegcolorspace ! videoscale ! ximagesink
> }}}
>
> I ask:
> * should the camera test use another command, such as xvimagesink?
> * are there any configuration methods to suppress the kernel messages?
> * are the kernel messages benign? If yes, this ticket can be closed.
New description:
During runin test on 11.2.0, over four hours, there are 10724 messages
from the kernel of which most are apparently triggered by the camera test.
* 7304 instances of ''viafb-camera viafb-camera: Funky IRQ 90200022'',
* 1865 instances of ''viafb-camera viafb-camera: Funky IRQ 90200020'',
* 1481 instances of ''viacam_quick_irq: N callbacks suppressed'', where N
ranges from 12 to 118, with the most frequent value 39.
The camera test does this:
{{{
/usr/bin/gst-launch v4l2src ! ffmpegcolorspace ! videoscale ! ximagesink
}}}
I ask:
* should the camera test use another command, such as xvimagesink?
* are there any configuration methods to suppress the kernel messages?
* are the kernel messages benign? If yes, this ticket can be closed.
--
Comment(by Quozl):
Ticket description version and build are inconsistent (now fixed), but
kern.log was certainly from an XO-1.5.
Retested with os871 on XO-1.5, using olpc-runin-tests 0.11.8-1 with
/runin/quick for a five minute pass, no VT switches made, no interaction
with the laptop, runin logs captured after test completion, the problem is
reproduced.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10981#comment:2>
One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
OLPC bug tracking system
More information about the Bugs
mailing list