#10352 LOW Not Tri: Browse activity - should about:mozilla be masked?

[Zarro Boogs per Child]

#10352: Browse activity - should about:mozilla be masked?
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
           Reporter:  greenfeld        |       Owner:  erikos                                 
               Type:  enhancement      |      Status:  new                                    
           Priority:  low              |   Milestone:  Not Triaged                            
          Component:  browse-activity  |     Version:  1.5/1.0 Software Build os852 aka 10.1.2
         Resolution:                   |    Keywords:                                         
        Next_action:  never set        |    Verified:  0                                      
Deployment_affected:                   |   Blockedby:                                         
           Blocking:                   |  
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment(by Quozl):

 I'm certain this is not a problem.  The text is creative writing, and in
 context relates to the early browser user adoption wars, and is a valid
 part of internet history.  It is well explained elsewhere.  We should
 leave decisions of content appropriateness to deployments, especially
 where there is doubt at our level, and direct them to remove the activity
 if they think it is so important.

 If we want to overservice, and if we can gain permission to modify Firefox
 and keep the name (unlikely and difficult), or are willing to use a
 derived name (ugly), then we might provide a modified en-US.jar file.  Or
 we might provide a script to delete the locale/en-US/global/mozilla.dtd
 file from the en-US.jar file.  Estimated four hours work with full
 testing.

 But still, I don't think this should be done.  Raise it upstream with
 Mozilla.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10352#comment:2>
One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
OLPC bug tracking system